David Wilcock’s FINANCIAL TYRANNY was a major, investigative work, exposing the satanic elements of our so-called “leaders” and their fellow-travelers in the mouthpiece media (the whores of modern Babylon, IMHO). Many in the alternative news community were skeptical as the fantastic story unfolded (like James Corbett, for example, but most, like Alex Jones, remained silent); at times it seemed like something out of an Indiana Jones plot line, with ships full of Chinese gold, dusty Depression-era trunks loaded with Federal Reserve bonds denominated in eight figures, and weird, ”Eyes Wide Shut” type machinations including ritual abuse and mind control, etc.
But the recent spate of bankster resignations around the globe have added substantive weight to Wilcock’s assertions, and some of the mysterious bonds have surfaced, too. Ben Fulford, who was a major contributor to the FINANCIAL TYRANNY expose´, repeatedly said that March 31st, a mere 28 hours from the time of this posting, was the deadline for the Illuminati controllers to step down, but from where I’m sitting, it is looking very unlikely that these bastards are going down voluntarily.
Now, in this first part new piecemeal story Wilcock is rushing to finish, he assures us that yes, the banksters will be brought down from power, and that humanity is poised for an unprecedented transition. I’ve only skimmed it because I wanted to get this linked quickly, so all I can say is read it and use your discernment.
UPDATE: (April 1) Here is my response to the “Divine Intervention” article. This is followed by the moderator’s response to my comment, and a short afterword:
Having read through the entire part 1, and listened to all three hours of the interview with “Drake,” I am hopeful, but must remain somewhat skeptical. Mr. Wilcock suffers from a blind spot when it comes to our current president, with whom he has tied his star, so to speak, in that the positive dreams about Obama he has had, and is resistant to admitting misinterpreting, continue to be just that: dreams and nothing more.
Consider that in the comment thread, the moderator admits that Mr. Wilcock must now conclude that Obama will not escape prosecution in this round-up of the psychopaths that have controlled our planet, but only because Obama was trying to protect his family from grievous harm.
Respectfully, I must submit this reasoning is nonsense. In the very Divine Intervention article itself, Mr. Wilcock paints a grim portrait of the recent Goldman Sachs scandal, and what has come to be known as “Muppetgate,” a reference to testimony given by ex-GS VP Greg Smith in a NYT editorial. Then why would Obama hire so many ex-Goldman Sachs employees if he was such a saint riding in on a white horse to save America? Was he just naive, and didn’t know Goldman Sachs was such an evil company? Or was he being threatened at the very outset of his presidency?
Well, that would not explain Obama’s flip flop on FISA/wiretapping in September ‘08 which he attested he would filibuster. Was Obama being threatened even then, Mr. Wilcock?
If so, Mr. Wilcock needs to be explicit and explain precisely why he can attest that Obama is a misunderstood, positive figure outside of some positive dreams he has had. What good has Obama done, Mr. Wilcock?
Why would he hire Eric Holder to be AG, when this was the man who helped cover up the Waco false flag terror operation when he was deputy AG under Janet Reno? Why would he present two fraudulent birth certificates as genuine? Why would he have a Social Security number hailing from CN when he’s never even been there? Why would he torture Bradley Manning in a Quantico hellhole for a year, and prosecute more whistleblowers than Bush? Why has no one come forward to attest to knowing Obama during his college years at Columbia, and why do his records remain scrupulously sealed?
And even more telling, why wouldn’t David ask “Drake,” his star guest with the scrupulous bonafides, what he thought about Obama and clear up this issue once and for all?
It is time for David to come clean, be forthright, and admit he was wrong about Obama. To continue to hedge in this increasingly irrational matter threatens his journalistic credibility, and the legitimacy of all his many hours of work on Financial Tyranny.
The only other possibility I can come up with is that David himself is being threatened by someone connected with our fraudulent “president,”, but even that is sketchy because we know that he is receiving protection from the anonymous guest from the radio show where David was crying profusely.
I apologize if this comes off as negative or complaining, moderator, but ultimately, what I am concerned about is David’s integrity as an alternative journalist to be exemplary. This is not to cast personal aspersions against Mr. Wilcock; I have spent many hours perusing his work, and have defended him online as well, but frankly, it is time for him to come clean on this issue.
[Moderator: The president is put in position to accept the blame, as a figurehead, for the people behind the scenes. If you direct all your hate towards Obama, you have fallen directly into the trap that was set for you. He has very little control over what is happening, as the alternative is the torture and death of him, his daughters and his wife.]
[April 1: I just put up a comment on the “Divine Intervention” thread to reply to the Moderator’s response. If it is posted, I will copy and paste it here (see below). For now, I’ll let you decide whether the moderator or myself is more non-contradictory in their thinking.
If you wish to dialogue with me about this issue, please leave in a comment in “Diablo’s Diabolical Dialogues” link at the top of this page. Thanks!]
UPDATE (April 2): Here’s a link to an update on the coming mass arrests of the psychopathic banksters and their fellow travelers in the District of Corruption.
UPDATE (April 8): The moderator chose not to respond to my reply. Here it is in full: